第2頁,共152頁 第一第一 12341252102 ... 最後最後
顯示結果從 11 到 20 共計 1578 條

混合查看

  1. #1
    註冊日期
    2011-02-27
    文章
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 10 Times in 4 Posts

    預設

    引用 作者: psycho 查看文章
    我個人的主觀看法是:

    在乎中頻的,LP比CD容易好聽;
    在乎超高頻與超低頻的,CD比LP容易好聽;

    在乎雜音與清晰的,CD比LP容易好聽;
    在乎『有味道的』,LP比CD容易好聽;

    至於真的要講究『進階級』的 HI-FI 性能,兩個都一樣難以好聽,各有各的強項與『現實問題』。所謂的『現實問題』最簡單的講法就是:

    錄音不夠頂級的唱片,通常LP遠遠大勝CD;
    現代最頂級的錄音唱片,只有CD而沒有LP;

    老大師只好找LP,現代高手只好找CD;不過我一定要強調,所謂現代高手『遠比不上』老大師這種事情其實非常非常非常非常.....非常罕見!....:D

    所以我個人認為玩LP有兩個很大的『入門陷阱』得克服:

    第一個就是:只聽到中頻,從而找不到真正錄音頂級的LP。
    第二個就是:容易以『好古非今』的態度來造成欣賞音樂的偏差....:o
    對於psycho的以上論述, 我有一點意見.

    超高頻, LP比CD 容易好聽, 可以找有三角鐵或鈸的錄音來做比較就知道, 如: OPUS 3 CYNDEE PETERS 所唱的 "THE HOUSE OF RISING SUN." 其原因, 很簡單, CD的高頻極限就是22.05kHz, 頻譜分析可以看見很多黑膠的高頻可以超過22.05kHz.

    至於超低頻,CD比LP容易好聽, 主要原因在於即使理想的唱臂的共振點為8~12Hz, 不論如何, 唱臂就是有低頻共振的問題, CD則沒有.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to hoping For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    註冊日期
    2007-12-12
    文章
    4,701
    Thanks
    593
    Thanked 2,728 Times in 1,376 Posts

    預設 CD比LP好?LP比CD好?

    CD比LP好?LP比CD好?

    如何比較呢?

    比什麼呢?

  4. #3
    註冊日期
    2007-06-07
    文章
    3,243
    Thanks
    3,175
    Thanked 2,972 Times in 1,404 Posts

    預設

    這個網頁有如何製作LP的影片

    http://blog.makezine.com/archive/201..._are_made.html

  5. #4
    註冊日期
    2009-02-14
    文章
    291
    Thanks
    213
    Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts

    預設

    最近有次在一位朋友家聽LP,他一直強調LP有較濃厚的味道,我也聽到了,但是受不了的是LP的瀝瀝洌洌雜聲一直出現,記得剛上班時的70年代,聽LP好像沒有那麼誇張的雜聲,是否是友人唱片或唱頭保養不夠好?

    能否推薦那邊可以聽到LP較對的聲音?那邊可以買到一手或二手LP系統?

    謝謝大家!
    新年快樂!

  6. #5
    註冊日期
    2008-06-14
    文章
    1,001
    Thanks
    135
    Thanked 316 Times in 121 Posts

    預設

    引用 作者: watson0612 查看文章
    最近有次在一位朋友家聽LP,他一直強調LP有較濃厚的味道,我也聽到了,但是受不了的是LP的瀝瀝洌洌雜聲一直出現,記得剛上班時的70年代,聽LP好像沒有那麼誇張的雜聲,是否是友人唱片或唱頭保養不夠好?

    能否推薦那邊可以聽到LP較對的聲音?那邊可以買到一手或二手LP系統?

    謝謝大家!
    新年快樂!
    現存LP很多都是年紀一大把,當片子受損或是不乾淨時,妙豆聲在所難免。
    LP的美妙在於氛圍,活生感,尤其是聽一些現場演奏的片子,更會讓人感動到想哭。
    同一張片子的cd和LP放在一起比較,你比較可以了解為什麼大家都說LP比較溫暖。
    當然,沒有調整到很好的LP系統很難在解析或背景乾淨度和CD系統相比,
    但胜在味道。

    以上請指教

  7. #6
    註冊日期
    2007-05-03
    文章
    74,053
    Thanks
    7,665
    Thanked 20,848 Times in 9,310 Posts

    預設

    "小高音響"可看看...:)

    引用 作者: watson0612 查看文章
    最近有次在一位朋友家聽LP,他一直強調LP有較濃厚的味道,我也聽到了,但是受不了的是LP的瀝瀝洌洌雜聲一直出現,記得剛上班時的70年代,聽LP好像沒有那麼誇張的雜聲,是否是友人唱片或唱頭保養不夠好?

    能否推薦那邊可以聽到LP較對的聲音?那邊可以買到一手或二手LP系統?

    謝謝大家!
    新年快樂!

  8. #7
    註冊日期
    2009-06-24
    文章
    205
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked 13 Times in 7 Posts

    預設

    引用 作者: watson0612 查看文章
    但是受不了的是LP的瀝瀝洌洌雜聲一直出現,
    這點我奉勸聽LP的朋友.
    ED1.2.絕版.直刻...........別聽信.
    只要不是近乎全新NM的片子千萬不要買.
    ED1一邊聽邊炒豆(headbang)
    別再當盤子啦.


    有一天偶去台北一家唱片行.見到一張我獨缺的片子(齊了就成套)
    老闆娘說這張讓給別人吧..啊??????
    說道:這片況不符您的要求.

  9. #8
    註冊日期
    2010-12-16
    文章
    448
    Thanks
    1,734
    Thanked 561 Times in 243 Posts

    預設

    愛玩LP的各位大大~
    有聽過底下這台機器嗎~

    http://www.winkey-audio.com.tw/bu-pr..._preamp100.htm

  10. #9
    註冊日期
    2012-04-17
    文章
    163
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 197 Times in 83 Posts

    預設

    [IMG][/IMG]




  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cica zhou For This Useful Post:


  12. #10
    註冊日期
    2012-04-17
    文章
    163
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 197 Times in 83 Posts

    預設

    Enjoying Turntables Without Obsessing


    唱盤的價格可根據精準度與手工藝區分。可以從三個地方著手:唱盤平台、馬達與驅動器、以及拾音臂。
    譬如說馬達需要無聲、唱盤平台越重可以維持速度的變動,同時也需要更大的馬達,但就會產生雜音。
    較輕的唱盤平台則可輕易傳輸振動,但會有鈴鈴聲‧

    看起來選唱盤還是不簡單!! 大家來研究唷!!


    Clockwise from top left: the Oracle Audio Delphi MK VI, the VPI Industries Classic 3, the Audio Technica AT-LP120-USB Direct-Drive Professional and the Music Hall mmf-2.2le turntables.



    Buying records is easy. You can find them by the milk crate at yard sales, for a few dollars apiece in used record stores, and there are new, special pressings by contemporary musicians like Shelby Lynne, whose “Just a Little Lovin’” album, at $30, is a top seller. But buying the instrument needed to listen to them, a turntable, is a different matter. “Young people didn’t grow up with turntables,” said Kenny Bowers, manager at Needle Doctor, a Minnesota store specializing in turntables. “It seems mysterious and complicated because you don’t just push a button and have it play for you.”

    There are advantages to old-fashioned analog music, according to some audiophiles. “There is a fuller sound to it, and more depth to the sound,” said Ryan Holiday, the New Orleans-based marketing director for American Apparel. He’s a new devotee of jazz and David Bowie, thanks to LPs. (For the youngsters, that stands for long playing, as in long-playing record; there were also small records called 45s). “I could hear hands going up and down the frets, and stuff that they probably didn’t want you to hear. Which is a nice little surprise,” he said.
    Mr. Holiday is not alone in his appreciation. Record sales have climbed for five years. Now turntable sales are growing. They were up 50 percent in January over January last year.

    Hi-fi elitists may debate competing technologies of moving coil versus moving magnet cartridges as if Middle East peace depended on the answer, but turntables are really simple machines. It doesn’t cost a great deal to get a good one, and today’s turntables give you more for your money than they did when vinyl ruled. The celebrated Thorens 125 MKII, with tonearm, cost about $500 in 1975. (That’s about $2,000 in today’s dollars.) A comparable one in performance today, like the Music Hall MMF-2.2 or the Pro-Ject Debut III Esprit, costs $300 to $500.

    Nevertheless, some turntables, like the Clearaudio Master Reference at $28,000, cost as much as a Toyota Camry hybrid.
    You are paying for two things, precision and craftsmanship. So here’s a guide to some of the costs. (It was just as confusing back in the 1960s, kids.) A turntable is basically three assemblies: the revolving platform the record sits on, called the platter, and the motor and drive; the tonearm, which moves across the record as it plays; and the cartridge and needle, which sit on the end of the tonearm and pick up the vibrations recorded in a record’s grooves.

    Turntables are machines that read vibrations, but they often can’t distinguish a good vibration from a Beach Boys album and a bad one from your stomping across the room. A good turntable is designed to isolate it from the real world.

    The motor needs to provide noiseless, consistent speed. A heavy platter helps to keep the speed from varying. But it’s an engineering game of Whac-A-Mole. Heavier platters need bigger motors, which may be noisier (and they cost more). Light platters can more easily transmit vibrations that can cause a ringing sound. The rule of thumb is make sure the table weighs at least 10 pounds. “If not, it’s made of plastic compound. It will sing along with music,” said Harry Weisfeld, the owner of the turntable maker VPI, based in Cliffwood, N.J. He advocates metal platters.

    You can also buy mats and special feet to isolate the turntable from outside vibrations.

    The kind of motor is even more hotly debated. One way the motor drives the platter is with a belt; the other is to mount the platter directly on the motor. Direct-drive mounting is preferred by some people because there is less chance the speed will vary. Rubber belts can stretch and loosen over time. But a direct-drive turntable is more likely to transmit noise, whereas rubber belts absorb motor vibrations.

    The crazy thing is that the least and most expensive turntables tend to be belt-driven. It’s really a personal preference. Trust your ears. The tonearm needs to keep the needle where it picks the most vibrations from the record without so much pressure that it damages the grooves. “The main thing is the weight,” said Scott Shaw, audio solutions specialist for Audio-Technica, an audio equipment maker. “Lighter tracking forces tend to provide better audio quality,” he said.

    With some exceptions, the better tonearms are machined in one piece of lightweight steel, not cast or pressed. There are more exotic tonearms of carbon fiber, composites, even wood, but you are going to find that only on turntables that cost more than $1,000, said Mr. Shaw.

    The cartridge is mounted on the end of the tonearm and holds the stylus, or needle. “The stylus is where everything happens,” said Michael Pettersen, director of applications engineering for Shure, which makes cartridges. “When you buy a $100 cartridge,” he said, “the needle is $90 of the cost.”

    Needles are either elliptical or spherical, with no significant price difference. Elliptical tends to be better at reproducing high-pitched sounds, said Mr. Pettersen. Spherical does a better job riding over flaws in vinyl, though, and may be better for 45s and worn records. (An even older form of record, the 78, require a special, larger stylus.) “If I have a very nasty record, I’ll use the spherical," Mr. Shaw said.

    There are also two kinds of cartridges, moving magnet and moving coil. Most cartridges are moving magnet. While they tend to be heavier than moving coil, you can change the stylus yourself, which you may want to do to adjust to the condition of your vinyl or change the sound you get.
    Moving coil is the type often favored by audiophiles because it has less weight, but changing a stylus requires a trip to the manufacturer. Both types typically wear out in 600 to 800 hours of use.

    Although the sky is the limit on price, a very good cartridge costs $75 to $100, said Mr. Pettersen.
    Getting the most from a turntable requires careful setup, although maybe not as careful as people who sell calibration equipment would have you believe. “Setting up the turntable doesn’t have to be as complicated as they make it,” said Mr. Shaw. There can be leeway from the exact specifications, he said, adding, “Set it up fairly close, it will be fine. My point is, don’t obsess.”

    One additional piece of gear Mr. Shaw recommends is a stylus gauge to measure the weight the cartridge is putting on the record. “Don’t rely on the little numbers on the back of the tonearm,” he said. “They are very inaccurate.” Mr. Bowers of Needle Doctor recommends the Shure scale, the SFG-2, available online for $20 to $40.
    It may also be worthwhile to buy a tool to make sure the cartridge is lined up properly. Mr. Bowers recommended the Mobile Fidelity Geo-Disc, which is $50 to $80.

    Finally, you can check some of your work with a test record, like the Cardas Frequency Sweep and Burn-In Record ($15 to $30), which plays tones that help confirm that the setup is correct.

    You may find that what sounds best is not the recommended settings, or what the gauges and protractors dictate. In the end, it’s as much art as science.
    And isn’t that the beauty of analog?

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to cica zhou For This Useful Post:


發文規則

  • 不可以發表新主題
  • 不可以發表回覆
  • 不可以上傳附件
  • 不可以編輯自己的文章
  •