第2頁,共2頁 第一第一 12
顯示結果從 11 到 20 共計 20 條
  1. #11
    註冊日期
    2007-05-03
    文章
    75,643
    Thanks
    7,666
    Thanked 20,851 Times in 9,313 Posts

  2. #12
    註冊日期
    2009-04-19
    文章
    74
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 31 Times in 16 Posts

    預設

    這個名單有不少遺珠之處
    我認為除了好聲之外還要有技術的獨特性或是對其他廠家的影響
    kLH9是好聲,不過既有Quad ESL入選,似乎沒有再選入它的必要?
    先不講大型的JBL,altec,Tannoy
    獨特的Heil ESS,Bose 901似乎都比幾個書架型揚聲器值得入選?
    magico mini2獨特的地方是它非常貴嗎?

  3. #13
    註冊日期
    2007-05-03
    文章
    75,643
    Thanks
    7,666
    Thanked 20,851 Times in 9,313 Posts

    預設

    Magico入選理由,就是很厲害的意思

    Certain speakers don’t just change the way the game is played; they change the playing field. In the twentieth century, the Quad ESL-57s (par excellence), the Maggie 1-Us, the Dahlquist DQ-10s, and the Wilson WATT/Puppy were bellwethers. In the new millennium there has been no more influential loudspeaker—no loudspeaker that has had a more profound effect on the way other loudspeaker manufacturers design and style their products—than these massive, beautiful, stand-mounted two-ways from upstarts Alon Wolf and Yair Tammam of Magico. The Mini and Mini II set new standards for neutrality, resolution, dynamic range, frequency extension, and musicality in compact speakers—and they did so not just by upping the ante on the way enclosures, drivers, and crossovers were built but also by upping the ante on the science that speaker manufacturers brought to bear on designing enclosures, drivers, and crossovers. Since the Mini II, birch-ply and aluminum boxes, high-tech composite cones, Mundorf parts, computer-assisted design have become mainstream—and other things like beryllium diaphragms, field-coil magnetics, and coincident drivers have been added to the mix. The competition in compact speakers has never been stiffer; nonetheless, the Magico Minis were the first on the ground and continue to more than hold their own against all comers.
    Jonathan Valin

  4. #14
    註冊日期
    2008-03-02
    文章
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

    預設

    I believe JBL Paragon should be included. (inlove)

    Also don't forget the coaxial design, Altec 604 serious or Tannoy Gold/silver (rofl)


  5. #15
    註冊日期
    2008-03-02
    文章
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

    預設

    almost forgot Lowther, Quad 57,

  6. #16
    註冊日期
    2009-08-12
    文章
    51
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts

    預設

    這種榜單不要太認真啦
    這裡面我比較認同的只有
    QUAD(平面單音路喇叭,承先啟後,包括他的專用低音也是非常有趣的設計)
    W/P(相位跟箱體的傑出設計)
    Khorn(背載號角,孔道式喇叭箱代表作)
    MBL 101(無箱體360度的創意)
    Infinity IRS(線音源的實踐,但是低音柱擺位很難兼顧頻響跟相位)

    比較最近的設計中比較有趣的
    我會推薦 Anthony Gallo Ref.3



    主要設計要點
    1. 壓電柱型高音,不需分音器,可離軸聆聽不衰減
    2. 金屬圓形密閉箱雙中音,無分音器
    3. 側面低音,幾乎無箱,雙線圈,一個過分音器,一個沒有(要另加分音過的擴大機)
    音場極大,動態誇張
    可惜我聽到的音色不太理想,不過該音響店的專業素質極差
    連喇叭線接法都是錯的

    最有意義的,可能是票選十大音響聲學論文吧
    喇叭設計的論文好像都離不開 Small, Thiel
    好像 K 完就可以設計喇叭了 XDDDD

  7. #17
    註冊日期
    2010-04-11
    文章
    22
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts

    預設

    10. Advent 那一對我有, 老聲音好聽, 用Grundig的老AMP推實在是絕配啊

  8. #18
    註冊日期
    2007-05-03
    文章
    75,643
    Thanks
    7,666
    Thanked 20,851 Times in 9,313 Posts

    預設

    這期的TAS果然收到許多讀者迴響

    說怎麼沒有這對、那對的....

  9. #19
    註冊日期
    2007-05-24
    文章
    144
    Thanks
    49
    Thanked 34 Times in 20 Posts

    預設

    Dahlquist DQ‑10這對實在不應該列入,有抄襲ESL-57之嫌。(不過Dahlquist DQ‑10這對聽說聲音不錯)
    另Rogers LS3/5a這對是新版的照片,應該不是推薦的原版本。

  10. #20
    註冊日期
    2010-07-17
    文章
    7
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    預設 我新做的胆机

    都很不错哦,只是不只怎么发不了帖

發文規則

  • 不可以發表新主題
  • 不可以發表回覆
  • 不可以上傳附件
  • 不可以編輯自己的文章
  •